*

I was thinking about having a really sturdy crossbar between the fork tines to resist the compression loads. A large nut and washer would provide the downward pressure via a vertical pivot stud or bolt. I do have limited milling ability on my lathe but would rather avoid milling slots in the fork tines just to fix a crossbar between them.
The original idea was to bolt the entire mounting together without machining. The cylinder rather dented the original plan but was at least optional. I just happened to have a chunk of 7" round stock. Alternative means could have been found for effectively supporting the Declination axis.
The original idea was to bolt the entire mounting together without machining. The cylinder rather dented the original plan but was at least optional. I just happened to have a chunk of 7" round stock. Alternative means could have been found for effectively supporting the Declination axis.
Two sturdy, spaced, 15mm studs between the tines would allow a vertical stud to pass between them with a 6" plate resting on top and sandwiched between the tines. The stiff cross studs would help to support the cross plate and simultaneously compress the fork tines together against the edges of this horizontal plate. Or plates, if a bottom plate is added.
Here is an image of the mounting supported from the new 1T lifting strop and 1T chain hoist. The steel hook allows more rapid movement along the ceiling joist than the former, multi-looped cord.
Front and rear sandwiched plates would make a closed box out of the fork and it would all be under heavy compression from the twin, horizontal cross studs. Plus the vertical compression from the central, pivot stud. The tops of the tines are compressed against the sides of the Dec housing by the altitude pivot stud. All helping to avoid flexure anywhere in the fork.
However, first I have to decide on the final fork dimensions and angles. I must avoid contact between the large RA wormwheel and the base plate, fork or large diameter pier pipe.
Materials shortage over. Another visit to the scrap yard produced more aluminium plate in various thicknesses up to 10mm. I now have a second 10mm [5/8"] base plate to bond to the first. A pack of Loctite 'Metal' is on its way in the post.
Front and rear sandwiched plates would make a closed box out of the fork and it would all be under heavy compression from the twin, horizontal cross studs. Plus the vertical compression from the central, pivot stud. The tops of the tines are compressed against the sides of the Dec housing by the altitude pivot stud. All helping to avoid flexure anywhere in the fork.
However, first I have to decide on the final fork dimensions and angles. I must avoid contact between the large RA wormwheel and the base plate, fork or large diameter pier pipe.
Materials shortage over. Another visit to the scrap yard produced more aluminium plate in various thicknesses up to 10mm. I now have a second 10mm [5/8"] base plate to bond to the first. A pack of Loctite 'Metal' is on its way in the post.
With the fork slope decided I could duplicate the tines. They are now 20mm thick [0.8"] and look far more substantial. As does the 20mm thick base though it has yet to be trimmed.
Open fibrous abrasive disks have been recommended for cleaning up rough aluminum edges and surfaces. I tried the local DIY chain store but they had nothing like it. Another online search and purchase is obviously required.
I spent another hour trying to level the sawn edges of the duplicated fork tines. Rubbing dry soap on the disks and files is a definite improvement.
The Loctite 'Metal' epoxy should arrive today to fix the plates firmly together. Plates simply held together with nuts and bolts tend to behave more like leaf springs under bending loads. The epoxy should make them behave more like the thicker material the laminations pretend to be. I shall have to have all my G-cramps ready to squash the plates hard together.
Click on any image for an enlargement.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment